Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emeharole, P.O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Stigmatized Illnesses In Africa

P.O. Emeharole, B.Sc., M.P.H., Dr. P.H., A.M.R.S.H.

Department of Health Education, Alvan Ikoku College of Education, Owerri, Nigeria

THIS PAPER is an empirical documentation of an epidemiological approach for detecting stigmatised illness in a rural African community, without at the same time igniting the 'flame' of stigmatisation. A mobile team of public health professionals in Imo State of Nigeria in collaboration with the author, conduced a 'masked' health survey of a pilot area.

The goal was to detect new cases of leprosy and tuberculosis which had been confined to their 'shell' on account of stigmatisation syndrome often associated with the two ailments. This goal was camouflaged in a spectrum of screening and other prophylactic measures while the outcome (new cases) was determined by blind assessment.

An analysis of the outcome of the screening exercise performed on 7845 and 6468 villagers, screened for leprosy and tuberculosis respectively, resulted in an overall incidence of 2.0 and 2.2 new cases of leprosy and tuberculosis. This predicament was seen as being con founded in two 'mutable' variables, namely complacency on the part of the population at risk and inadequate surveillance on catchment areas by public health agencies. Suggestions advanced for improving control measures include a joint collaborative arrangement by the three-type authorities responsible for the three-sector battle against leprosy namely control measures, treatment of cases and rehabilitation of ex-lepers.

The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, Vol. 107, No. 1, 23-25 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/146642408710700110
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?