This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rowland, A. Articles by Hughes, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Water Contamination in North Cornwall: A Retrospective Cohort Study into the Acute and Short- Term Effects of the Aluminium Sulphate Incident in July 1988

Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Health Authority, Department of Community Medicine

R. Grainger

Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Health Authority, Department of Community Medicine, Department of Public Health, St Helier, Jersey

R. Stanwell Smith

Bristol and Weston Health Authority, Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, Colindale, London

N. Hicks

Bristol and Weston Health Authority, Department of Public Health Medicine

A. Hughes

Senior Lecturer, University of Bristol, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health Medicine

IN JULY 1988 the drinking water supply of part of Cornwall was contaminated with 20 tons of aluminium sulphate solution. Emergency measures ensured that aluminium sulphate levels in most parts of the water distribution system were rapidly reduced, but residents were supplied with water containing raised concentra tions of aluminium and other metals for at least a few days. A retrospective cohort study compared 480 individuals in the exposed area with 532 individuals resident in an area served by a different water supply. The exposed group were more likely to complain of all 18 symptoms in the questionnaire enquiry. They had a significantly higher relative risk of experiencing painful joints. These symptoms were reported by less than a quarter of the respondents exposed to contaminated water. This may represent a previously unrecognised acute effect of water contammation with aluminium sulphate, but the study does not exclude the possibility that the threshold for symptom reporting was lowered by anxiety and by the publicity associated with the incident. The overall response rate of the study was low (45%) and reflects the difficulties in both carrying out and interpreting environmental epidemiological studies of acute incidents.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?