Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doss, S.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, A.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phenothrin Lotion, the Latest Recruit in the Battle Against Headlice: The Results of Two Controlled Comparative Studies

S. Doss, R.G.N.

Didsbury Clinic, Didsbury, Manchester, England

C.A. Powell, R.G.N., R.M., R.H.V.

Community Services Unit, Wendover, Downend, Bristol, England

A.J. Miller, M.B., B.S., M.R.C.P.

Medical Department, Napp Laboratories Limited, Cambridge, England

ONE HUNDRED and one subjects with head louse infestation were entered into two separate studies, in which a phenothrin aqueous/alcoholic lotion was compared to a carbaryl lotion and a malathion lotion.

Fifty subjects were treated with a single application of the phenothrin lotion, 28 with the carbaryl lotion and 23 with the malathion lotion.

In the comparative study of the phenothrin and malathion lotions an inspection on the day following treatment showed no live lice remained, but that six of the subjects treated with malathion lotion still had evidence of viable eggs (p<0.05). In one subject viable eggs were still evident at two weeks post-treatment. There were no cases, however, of live lice or viable eggs at four weeks post-treatment. Mild cutaneous side-effects were reported in five subjects, the inci dence of which was not significantly different by treatment group.

One subject in the phenothrin and carbaryl lotion comparative study had evidence of live lice at one week post-treatment with phenothrin lotion. This subject received no further treatment and was clear of both live lice and viable eggs at subsequent visits.

A separate case of live lice infestation was found at two weeks post-treatment in a subject treated with phenothrin lotion and at four weeks post-treatment in two subjects treated with carbaryl lotion.

As these subjects were free of live lice infestation at previous follow-up visits it was highly probable that these were cases of re-infestation from another source.

Two subjects treated with carbaryl lotion, one of whom also had evidence of live lice, had viable eggs at four weeks, again probably due to re-infestation.

A significantly greater incidence of side-effects (p<0.05) was found in the carbaryl lotion treatment group, which were again of a mild cutaneous nature.

These studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this phenothrin lotion and suggest that it would be a useful and acceptable addition to the currently avail able range of insecticidal preparations.

The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, Vol. 111, No. 2, 47-50 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/146642409111100202


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?