Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donaldson, R.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Essential Food Hygiene Certificate Examination: Examination Papers Reviewed

R.J. Donaldson, OBE HonFRSH

One thousand papers for the Essential Food Hygiene exami nation, chosen consecutively from those being processed in RSH House on 6-7 April 1994, were reviewed.

The purpose of the review was to assess the impact of the redesigned course and the new examination papers which were introduced from 1 January 1994. The pass rate for the sample was 96.7% which was somewhat lower than the pass rate of 99.2% for the whole of 1993 when the previous examination papers were in use.

Out of 1000 papers 33 were failures. Eighteen candi dates had obtained the 70% pass mark yet still failed because one of the two questions on temperature control had been answered incorrectly. The requirement to answer both those questions correctly in order to obtain a certifi cate was introduced with the new examination papers and marked a major change.

The conclusion from this snapshot study was that the majority of Tutors and the candidates from their courses had achieved a high degree of examination success. In particular, Tutors had secured a major objective by ensu ring that trainees had a clear understanding of the concepts of temperature control. Only a minority were having diffi culty. Of the 33 individuals who failed, 18 came from just four of the 108 courses.

The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, Vol. 114, No. 4, 204-207 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/146642409411400408


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?