Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, G.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Conference

The smallpox saga and the origin(s) of vaccination

G.C. Cook

Hospital for Tropical Diseases St Pancras Way London NW1 OPE

Two hundred years ago - in May 1796 - Edward Jenner carried out a pioneering feat in the history of 'clinical investigation' which not only paved the way for the eventual elimination of one of the world's most terrifying infections (variola), but also heralded widespread vaccination campaigns and the foundation of the discipline of clinical immunology. Vaccination superseded the formerly used technique of variolation which had been introduced into England by Lady Mary Wortley Montague. Under-recognised is the fact that the first clinical trial(s) of this new development were carried out under the supervision of William Woodville at the St Pancras Smallpox Hospital (situated at Battle Bridge - now King's Cross); this work was crucially important in the 'vaccination saga' and deserves far greater acceptance than is currently the case.

The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, Vol. 116, No. 4, 253-255 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/146642409611600412


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?