The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, A R P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, Vol. 116, No. 6, 360-366 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/146642409611600604
© 1996 Royal Society for the Promotion of Health

Diet in the prevention of cancer: what are the chances of avoidance?

A R P Walker

Human Biochemistry Research Unit Department of Tropical Diseases School of Pathology of the University of the Witwatersrand, and The South African Institute for Medical Research Johannesburg South Africa

In most western populations, cancer causes about a fifth of all deaths, and in developing populations, 5-15%, with the likelihood of further rises. Diet is considered responsible for about a third of cases of cancer and smoking another third. Dietarily, for cancer avoidance, recommendations made include eat less, eat much less fat especially saturated fat, and eat more plant foods, i.e. cereals, but very particularly vegetables and fruit. However, only high consumptions of the latter are consistently associated with a lower risk of cancers, notably of the digestive and respiratory tracts. For each change urged, meaningful compliance will be very difficult, due largely to conservativeness as well as to the higher cost of a 'prudent' diet. Notwithstanding, urges to make dietary changes, particularly relating to plant foods, must be continued, especially with regard to persons familially susceptible and, additionally, with the recognition that the measures recommended also serve to lessen susceptibility to cardiovascular diseases. Compliance, even by a small proportion, could result in large numbers benefiting due to the universality of the burden from cancer.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?