This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wood, N. Articles by Kumar, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Do the homeless get a fair deal from General Practitioners?

Health Sciences Research Centre Chichester Institute College Lane Chichester West Sussex PO19 4PE

C. Wilkinson

Health Sciences Research Centre Chichester Institute College Lane Chichester West Sussex PO19 4PE

A. Kumar

Health Sciences Research Centre Chichester Institute College Lane Chichester West Sussex PO19 4PE

Many studies have indicated the health status of homeless people to be typically poorer than that of the general population, with various studies indicating a high prevalence of psychiatric illness, drug or alcohol misuse and associated socio-medical problems.

The Bristol Primary Healthcare Project is an agency which was established to provide a local health care service tailored to the needs of people who are homeless. The present study was carried out as part of an evaluation of the service offered locally to homeless people by General Practitioners (GPs). A postal questionnaire survey of 155 general practices within the Avon FHSA area was carried out. Both fundholding and non-fundholding practices were included, within an area including inner city, urban and rural/semi-rural locations. One hundred and seventeen completed questionnaires were returned, providing a response rate of 75%.

Twenty-seven percent of practices would fully register a homeless person who seeks to register at the practice, 24% would treat as immediate and necessary and 33% would treat as a temporary resident. Four percent of fundholding practices surveyed would fully register homeless persons and 55% of inner city practices would do so. Seventy-nine percent of doctors indicated that homeless patients were more difficult to treat than other patients.

The most frequent problems associated with registering homeless persons were perceived to be the associated social problems (90% of respondents agreed), the lack of medical records (88% agreed), the complex health problems (79% agreed) and the associated alcohol or substance misuse (78% agreed).

The study has highlighted a need for government to consider providing incentives to GPs to register homeless people without resulting in adverse effects on their contract targets. The reluctance of some practices to register these patients varied by area and type of practice with doctors at fundholding practices being the most reluctant. There is an identified need for further health education and promotion work and initiatives exemplified by the Bristol Primary Healthcare Project for people who are homeless.

Key Words: General practitioners • health needs • homelessness • primary care

The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, Vol. 117, No. 5, 292-297 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/146642409711700506


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?