Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, J
Right arrow Articles by Balchin, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Community self-help and the homeless poor in Latin America

J Stewart

School of Health and Social Care, Avery Hill Campus, Mansion Site, University of Greenwich, Avery Hill Road, Eltham SE9 2UG, England, j.l.stewart{at}greenwich.ac.uk

P Balchin

School of Architecture and Construction, University of Greenwich, Oakfield Lane, Dartford DA1 2SZ, England, p.n.balchin{at}greenwich.ac.uk

Finding realistic housing solutions that are able to respond to the realities of poverty in the developing, or newly industrialising, world are frequently distinct from those suited to the developed world due to levels of poverty and differing welfare regimes. This requires a different understanding of the concept of housing and shelter for developing and developed countries. Population increase and emerging habitation patterns in parts of Latin America have required that policy-makers review traditional ‘top down’ approaches to the way the homeless poor are treated and how self-help or ‘bottom up’ schemes are increasingly seen as a sustainable way forward in providing affordable housing options to both governments and communities.

Over the last decades, mass in-migration to cities has put pressure on governments to provide public housing - but two major problems arose: firstly, governments found it difficult to finance the increasing demand for public housing; and secondly, the nature of employment and the informal economy in the developing world meant that this new housing was often too costly for the urban poor, in some cases increasing homelessness still further.

Recent policy developments tend to favour supporting what the poor are and have been able to achieve for themselves, with appropriate government support. Upgrading shack settlements is now recognised as a community driven and cost-effective response that can, if appropriately supported, offer an initial and sustainable solution to urban housing need by tapping into additional non-governmental sources of funding. In the absence of a major public sector housing stock to meet demand, governments are also recognising that self-help housing schemes for families able to access funding and resources offer a further innovative approach to meeting housing need.

The nature of housing and shelter in the developing world requires a unique response so that it remains attainable and affordable to the poor. Neo-liberal policies, increasingly adopted in Latin America, are not able to provide suitable, sustainable and affordable housing delivery and alternatives need to be explored. This paper traces some developments in Latin American housing policy and explores some of the challenges that are faced in responding to the unique housing needs of the urban poor.

Key Words: Homelessness • housing credit schemes • housing the urban poor • informal housing • Latin America • self-help schemes • shack settlements • social housing • squatter housing

The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, Vol. 122, No. 2, 99-107 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/146642400212200211


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?