This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lee, M. Articles by Owen, L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Best practice in smoking cessation services for pregnant women: results of a survey of three services reporting the highest national returns, and three beacon services

Tobacco Dependence Research & Treatment Centre, Barts and The London, Queen Mary’s School of Medicine and Dentistry, Turner Street, London E1 2AD

Peter Hajek, PhD

Tobacco Dependence Research & Treatment Centre, Barts and The London, Queen Mary’s School of Medicine and Dentistry, Turner Street, London E1 2AD, p.hajek{at}qmul.co.uk

Hayden McRobbie, MB ChB

Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

Lesley Owen, MSc PhD

Health Development Agency, Holborn Gate, 330 High Holborn, London WC1V 7BA

Aims: The NHS allocated dedicated funds to establish specialist smoking cessation services for pregnant smokers in England in 2000. An early survey revealed some uncertainty as to how the new services should work and monitor their outcome. The current survey focused on identifying examples of good practice in this difficult new field.

Method: Three services with the highest number of successful four-week quitters reported for the 2003/4 monitoring year were identified from Department of Health (DH) monitoring records, and three services were nominated from those known in the field as examples of best practice. There was no overlap between the two groups. All six services provided in-depth interviews.

Results: All three highest ranking services that reported close to 100 per cent success rates included unaided quitters identified from hospital wards, rather then smokers actually treated. They had only minimal or average genuine treatment provision for pregnant smokers in place. The three beacon services far exceeded the national throughput and outcome average identified in the previous survey, and provided a wealth of useful information. Although they differed in staffing levels and other aspects of their activities, they all shared several key elements, including a systematic training of midwives in how to refer pregnant smokers, offering nicotine replacement treatment to almost all clients and having an efficient system of providing the prescriptions, offering flexible home visits, and providing intensive multi-session treatment delivered by a small number of dedicated staff.

Conclusion: Smoking cessation services for pregnant women may need clearer guidance on what they are expected to provide, and how they should monitor their outcome. The key features of the beacon services can serve as a practical model of current best practice applicable across most PCTs.

Key Words: Good practice • midwives • pregnancy • service development • smoking cessation

The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, Vol. 126, No. 5, 233-238 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1466424006068241


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R J Lowry, A. Billett, C. Buchanan, and S. Whiston Increasing breastfeeding and reducing smoking in pregnancy: a social marketing success improving life chances for children Perspectives in Public Health, November 1, 2009; 129(6): 277 - 280. [Abstract] [PDF]